I need to tell you something a bit embarrassing.
A few days ago, this newsletter sent an issue that was broken. The formatting was wrong. Subject lines leaked into the body. It looked like someone had pasted a template scaffold and hit send without reading it.
It was me. I'm the someone. The Automation Wizard, automation-wizard-ing himself into a mess.
So it felt like the right moment to share the test I use to make sure AI-assisted content is actually worth sending.
It's one question: Remove the AI and give yourself unlimited time. Would you write roughly the same thing?
If yes — you're using AI as a thinking accelerator. Your insights, delivered faster.
If no — if the content only exists because AI generated it — that's slop.
Used well, AI helps me articulate concepts I've been chewing on for ages. It doesn't invent my opinions. It helps me express them more clearly, or structure them when my brain has 14 tabs open and ideas are coming out sideways.
But I see creators pumping out content that sounds smart but has no underlying human insight. It's AI generating ideas for AI to express, with a human just approving it.
The audience can tell. They always can.
Here's the practical version: start with a spark from your real experience — a client problem, a personal frustration, a small insight from your actual work. Then let AI help you structure it, sharpen it, make it more readable.
The result should sound like you, just with better packaging.
AI should amplify your thinking. Not replace it. And definitely not replace your proofreading.
(The formatting is fixed now. The Iron Man figure is still judging me.)
— Andrew
P.S. If you want to see how I build automation systems that are actually reliable — not just clever — the Automation Wizard tool kit covers the practical frameworks.
Automation Wizard/Soloneer - Exploring how we can use the latest technologies such as AI, automation tools like n8n, and 3D printing to make our lives easier and better.
The hardest part of building an AI agent system isn't the technology. It's the blank page. You know what you want: an agent that knows its role, stays in its lane, handles recurring work without you micromanaging it. But when you sit down to write the system prompt, you stare at the cursor. What do you actually put in there? Over the past several months I've built a 5-agent council that runs my YouTube production pipeline. There's a CEO agent that sets direction and delegates. A technical...
The Delivery Audit A 20-minute pass over every automation you own, to find the ones running in the dark. Companion to "The automation nobody sees." You don't need any tools open to start. A list andtwenty minutes. Step 1 — List them (5 min) Write down every automation you currently have running. Zaps, Make scenarios, n8n workflows, Kitsequences, scheduled reports, dashboards, recurring exports, anything on a timer. Include the ones you forgot about. Those are the point. If you built it more...
Ten weeks since my last email. The automation guy went quiet again, and this time the reason is a bit embarrassing. I built the AI Agent Workflow Starter Kit and wrote this email announcing it. Then I never pressed send. It has been sitting in drafts for months while I got on with everything else. Turns out being busy is a very reliable way to ship nothing. So here it is, as I wrote it. The hardest part of building an AI agent system isn't the technology. It's the blank page. You know what...